Effect of retained node numbers of Cabernet Franc grapevine on the interception of solar radiation and on the node fertility

Authors

  • Douglas André Würz Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina, Canoinhas, SC, Brasil.
  • Bruno Farias Bonin Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, SC, Brasil.
  • Alberto Fontanella Brighenti Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina, São Joaquim, SC, Brasil
  • Adrielen Tamiris Canossa Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, SC, Brasil.
  • Juliana Reinehr Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, SC, Brasil.
  • Ricardo Allebrandt Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, SC, Brasil.
  • Betina Pereira de Bem Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, SC, Brasil.
  • Leo Rufato Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, SC, Brasil.
  • Aike Anneliese Kretzschmar Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Lages, SC, Brasil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711842019453

Keywords:

Vitis vinifera L., pruning, vegetative balance, canopy management

Abstract

Due to a lack of technical-scientific information about the effect of the retained node number on the interception of the solar radiation of the nodes and its effect on the fertility of nodes, this work aims to evaluate the effect of the increased number of nodes of the grapevine Cabernet Franc in relation to the interception of the photosynthetically active composition and its effect on the node fertility in high altitude region of Santa Catarina State. This experiment was conducted during the 2016/2017 harvest in a commercial vineyard located in the city of São Joaquim. Cabernet Franc plants grafted on the 'Paulsen 1103' rootstock were used. The treatments consisted of four different levels of retained node numbers: 15, 30, 50, and 75 nodes per plant. The experimental design was a randomized block design with four blocks and five plants per plot. The data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and compared by the Tukey test with a 5% probability of error. The results of this study evidenced the importance of the interception of the photosynthetically active radiation in the nodes fertility, observing the reduction of the nodes fertility in situations of reduction of the interception of the photosynthetically active radiation, in this case, caused by the increase of the number of nodes, which resulted in a higher shoot number and branches, resulting in a denser canopy, and consequently reducing the interception of the photosynthetically active radiation that reaches the grape nodes, being this effect more pronounced in the buds located at the basal position of the branch.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Douglas André Würz, Instituto Federal de Santa Catarina, Canoinhas, SC, Brasil.

Engenheiro Agrônomo e Sommelier Internacional, com experiência na área de Viticultura, Enologia e Análise Sensorial de Vinhos. Especialista em Proteção de Plantas pela Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) e especialista em Agronegócio (Unicesumar). Desempenhou Funções de Engenheiro Agrônomo, Gerente de Campo, Recepção de visitantes e degustações em Vinícola. Atuou também como professor de Viticultura, Fitossanidade e Administração e Economia Rural do Curso Técnico de Viticultura e Enologia, da Escola de Ensino Básico Manoel Cruz, em São Joaquim - Santa Catarina. Possui qualificação WSET Level 1 Award in Wines (QCF), pela The Wine School & Spirit Education Trust Limited e é Sommelier Internacional pela FISAR/UCS. Atualmente é Mestrando em Produção Vegetal da Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina - UDESC, atuando na área de Viticultura e Enologia. Colunista sobre Vinhos no "Jornal A Tribuna" de São Joaquim - SC, no jornal "Diário de RioMafra" de Mafra - SC e no Jornal "Testo Notícias" de Pomerode - SC, no Jornal "Correio do Contestado" de Papanduva - SC, no Jornal "Perfil" de Rio Negrinho - SC e "Revista Expressiva" de Lages - SC.

References

AHMAD MW et al. 2004. Effect of pruning severity on growth behavior of spur and bunch morphology of grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Perlette. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 6: 160-161.

ANDREINI L et al. 2009. Study on the morphological evolution of bud break in Vitis vinifera L. Vitis 48: 153–158.

BEM BP et al. 2016. Effect of four training systems on the temporal dynamics of downy mildew in two grapevine cultivars in southern Brazil. Tropical Plant Pathology 41: 370-379.

BINDON K et al. 2008. Influence of partial root zone drying on the composition and accumulation of anthocyanins in grape berries (Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet sauvignon). Australian Journal and Grape Wine Research 14: 91–103.

BOTELHO RV et al. 2006. Fertilidade de Gemas de Videira: Fisiologia e fatores envolvidos. Ambiência 2: 129-144.

BRIGHENTI AF et al. 2014. Desempenho vitícola de variedades autóctones italianas em condição de elevada altitude no Sul do Brasil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 49: 465-474.

BRIGHENTI AF et al. 2017. Ecophysiology of three Italian cultivars subjected to two pruning methods in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Acta Horticulturae 1: 381-388.

CHRISTENSEN LP et al. 1994. The effects of pruning level and post bud break cane adjustment on Thompson seedless raisin production and quality. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 45: 141-152.

GREVEN MM et al. 2014. Influence of retained node number on Sauvignon Blanc grapevine vegetative growth and yield. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 20: 263-271.

GREVEN MM et al. 2015. Influence of retained node number on Sauvignon Blanc grapevine phenology in a cool climate. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 21: 209-301.

JACKSON DI & LOMBARD PB. 1993. Environmental and management practices affecting grape composition and wine quality – a review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 44: 409-430.

KELLER M & KOBLET W. 1995. Dry matter and leaf area partitioning, bud fertility and second season growth of Vitis vinifera L.: Responses to nitrogen supply and limiting irradiance. Vitis 34: 77-83.

KURTURAL SK et al. 2006. Effects of pruning and cluster thinning on yield and fruit composition of ‘Chambourcin’ grapevines. HortTechnology 16: 233–240.

MAFRA SHM et al. 2011. Atributos químicos do solo e estado nutricional de videira Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) na Serra Catarinense. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias 10: 44-53.

MALINOVSKI LI et al. 2016. Viticultural performance of Italian grapevines in high altitude regions of Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Acta Horticulturae 1115: 203-210.

MIELE A & MANDELLI F. 2012. Manejo do dossel vegetativo e seu efeito nos componentes de produção da videira Merlot. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 34: 964-973.

MARCON FILHO JL et al. 2015. Raleio de cachos sobre o potencial enológico da uva 'Cabernet Franc' em duas safras. Ciência Rural 45: 2150-2156.

MULLINS MG et al. 2000. Biology of the grapevine. Cambridge: University Press. 239p.

MUNHOZ B et al. 2016. Fertilidade e Análise de gemas das videiras Greco di Tufo, Coda di Volpe e Viognier cultivadas em São Joaquim – Santa Catarina. Revista Agropecuária Catarinense 29: 68-72.

O’DANIEL SB et al. 2012. Effects of balanced pruning severity on Traminette (Vitis spp.) in a warm climate. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 63: 284–290.

PELLEGRINO A et al. 2014. Management practices impact vine carbohydrate status to a greater extent than vine productivity. Frontiers in Plant Science 5: 1-13.

ROSA AM et al. 2014. Fertilidade e reserva de carbono e nitrogênio em gemas de ramos das viníferas ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ e ‘Nebbiolo’. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 36: 576-585.

POTTER RO et al. 2004. SOLOS do Estado de Santa Catarina. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos, 726p. (Embrapa Solos. Boletim de pesquisa e desenvolvimento, 46).

TONIETTO J & CARBONNEAU A. 2004. A multicriteria climatic classification system for grape-growing regions worlwide. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 124: 81-97.

VASCONCELOS MC et al. 2009. The flowering process of Vitis vinifera: a review. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 60: 411-434.

WINKLER AJ. 1965. Viticultura. México: Continental. 792p.

WURZ DA et al. 2017a. New wine-growing regions of Brazil and their importance in the evolution of Brazilian wine. BIO Web of Conferences 9: 1-4.

WURZ DA et al. 2017b. Agronomic performance of ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ with leaf removal management in a high-altitude region of Southern Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 52: 869-876.

WURZ DA et al. 2018. Época de desfolha e sua influência no desempenho vitícola da uva ‘Sauvignon Blanc’ em região de elevada altitude. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias 17: 91-99.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-12

How to Cite

WÜRZ, Douglas André; BONIN, Bruno Farias; BRIGHENTI, Alberto Fontanella; CANOSSA, Adrielen Tamiris; REINEHR, Juliana; ALLEBRANDT, Ricardo; DE BEM, Betina Pereira; RUFATO, Leo; KRETZSCHMAR, Aike Anneliese. Effect of retained node numbers of Cabernet Franc grapevine on the interception of solar radiation and on the node fertility. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 18, n. 4, p. 453–458, 2019. DOI: 10.5965/223811711842019453. Disponível em: https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/14278. Acesso em: 4 nov. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 4 (2019)

Section

Research Article - Science of Plants and Derived Products

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Journal of Agroveterinary Sciences)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:

a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.

b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.

c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>