CARBENDAZIN, PROCHLORAZ, PROPICONAZOLE, AND TEBUCONAZOLE TO CONTROL SOYBEAN POWDERY MILDEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811710112002046Keywords:
Glycine max, Chemical control, fungicide, fungicide, Microsphaera diffusaAbstract
The prevalence of powdery mildew (Microsphaera diffusa) on soybean (Glycine max) is increasing in Brazil. This fact suggests that actions to control this disease have to be taken. One of these actions is the application of fungicides. Therefore, four field experiments, in a completely randomized block design with four (tests 1 and 2) or three (tests 3 and 4) replications, were performed to evaluated the effect of fungicides against the soybean powdery mildew. These experiments were conducted in Londrina, PR (1999/2000) where soybean is constantly and extensively cultivated. The cultivar EMBRAPA 48 was used and just one application of the products was made at the growth stage R4. The treatments of Test 1 (ai = active ingredient; cp = commercial product) were: - prochloraz [450g ai/L] + propiconazole [250g ai/L] (0.5L cp/ha + 0.25L cp/ha); tebuconazole-1 [250g/L] + prochloraz (0.3+0.5); prochloraz (0.5); tebuconazole-1 (0.2); tebuconazole-2 [200g/L] (0.75); tebuconazole-1 + propiconazole (0.3+0.25); tebuconazole-1 + carbendazin-1 (0.3+0.35); propiconazole + carbendazin-1 (0.2+0.35); and the control (water). The treatments of test 2 were: carbendazin-1 (0.5); propiconazole (0.5); propiconazole (0.3); tebuconazole-1 (0.4); tebuconazole-1 + carbendazin-1 (0.4+0.3); tebuconazole-2 (0.5); carbendazin-2 [500g/L] (0.5); prochloraz (0.75); and the control (water). The treatments of the test 3 were similar to those of the test 1, but with the mixture of tebuconazole-1 + carbendazin-1 (0.24+0.25) replacing the treatment with tebuconazole-1 (0.2). The treatments of test 4 were similar to those of test 2, but the treatments with tebuconazol-1 + carbendazim-1 and prochloraz (0,75) were replaced by treatments with tebuconazole-1 (0,6) and tebuconazole-2 (0,75). The best fungicides to control powdery mildew were: test 1 - tebuconazole-2 (0.75), prochloraz + propiconazole (0.5+0.25), propiconazole + carbendazin-1 (0.2+0.35), and tebuconazole-1 + propiconazole (0.3+0.25); test 2 - carbendazin-1 (0.5), carbendazin-2 (0.5), and tebuconazole-2 (0.5); test 3 - prochloraz + propiconazole (0.5+0.25), tebuconazole-1 + prochloraz (0.3+0.5), and tebuconazole-1 + propiconazole (0.3+0.25), and; test 4 - all treatments with fungicides were efficient.
Downloads
References
AZEVEDO, L. A. S. Manual de quantificação de doenças de plantas. São Paulo, Novartis Biociências - Setor Agro, 1998, 114p.
BLUM, L. E. B.; GABARDO, H. Controle químico da ferrugem do alho na região de Curitibanos/SC. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v. 18, n. 1, p. 230-232, 1993.
BLUM, L. E. B.; GABARDO, H. Controle químico da sarna da macieira em Lebon Regis/SC. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v. 19, n. 1, p. 99-101, 1994.
McGEE, D. C. Soybean diseases: a reference source for seed technologists. St. Paul, APS Press, 1992, 151p.
MICHEL, C. A.; REIS, E. M. Controle químico do oídio e do complexo de doenças de final de ciclo na cultura da soja. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v. 23, suplemento, p. 260, 1998.
MICHEL, C. A.; REIS, E. M.; VIEIRA, R. Controle químico do oídio na cultura da soja. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v. 23, suplemento, p. 259, 1998.
MILLEO, M. V. R.; VENANCIO, W. S.; ZAGONEL, J.; CASTANHEIRAS, A. F. F. Avaliação de fentin hydroxide aplicado isoladamente e em mistura no controle do oídio, induzido por Microsphaera diffusa em soja. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v. 24, suplemento, p. 306, 1999.
PICININI, E. C.; FERNANDES, J. M. Controle químico do oídio Microsphaera diffusa em soja no ano de 1997. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v. 22, suplemento, p. 297, 1997.
PICININI, E. C.; FERNANDES, J. M. Doenças da soja: diagnose, epidemiologia e controle. Passo Fundo, EMBRAPA-Trigo, 1998, 91p.
REIS, E. M.; MEDEIROS, C. A.; CASA, R. T. Epidemia de oídio da soja, causada por Microsphaera diffusa, na safra 1996/97, no RS. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v. 22, suplemento, p. 300-301, 1997.
RITCHIE, S.; HANWAY, J. J.; THOMPSON, H. E. How a soybean plant develops. Ames: Iowa State University of Science and Technology, Coop. Ext. Serv., 1982, 20p. (Special Report, 53)
SAWADA, E; AZEVEDO, L. A. S. Avaliação de fungicidas no controle do oídio (Erysiphe polygoni DC.) da soja. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v. 22, suplemento, p. 306, 1997.
TANAKA, M. A. S.; MASCARANHAS, M. A. A.; ITO, M. F. Reação de cultivares de soja ao oídio (Microsphaera diffusa). Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v. 22, suplemento, p. 314, 1997.
UTIAMADA, C. M.; SATO, L. N.; Vida, J. B.; YORINORI, J. T. Eficiência de fungicidas no controle de oídio da soja. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, v. 24, suplemento, p.339-340, 1999.
YORINORI, J. T. Soja (Glycine max (L.) Merril) - controle de doenças. Cap. 21, p. 953-1023. In: Ribeiro do Vale, F. X; Zambolim, L. Controle de doenças de plantas. v. 2. Viçosa, UFV/MAA, 1997.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2002 Authors & Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.
c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.