Is the chemical control of glyphosate-resistant hairy fleabane more efficient during pre-flowering or re-growth?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711532016277Keywords:
Conyza bonariensis, herbicides, growth stage.Abstract
To test the efficacy of alternative herbicides for controlling of glyphosate-resistant Conyza bonariensis under different growth stages, we carried out an experiment in an apple orchard, in a factorial arrangement 2x5, consisting of: (i) two growth stages – pre-flowering and re-growth; and (ii) five herbicides – glyphosate, glufosinate, bentazon, diquat, and glyphosate+saflufenacil. Basagran, diquat, and glyphosate+saflufenacil were not efficient to control C. bonariensis in pre-flowering. Glufosinate, diquat, bentazon, and glyphosate+saflufenacil controlled C. bonariensis in re-growth. Just glufosinate showed efficient control (>90%) of C. bonariensis in both pre-flowering and re-growth. In general, control of C. bonariensis is more efficient in re-growth.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2016-11-11
How to Cite
PEREIRA, Liese de Vargas; CARVALHO, Leonardo Bianco de; DAL MAGRO, Taísa. Is the chemical control of glyphosate-resistant hairy fleabane more efficient during pre-flowering or re-growth?. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 15, n. 3, p. 277–280, 2016. DOI: 10.5965/223811711532016277. Disponível em: https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/223811711532016277. Acesso em: 18 may. 2024.
Issue
Section
Scientific Note
License
Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.
c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.
