Vegetative propagation of rootstocks and budding of ‘Irati’ Japanese plum in recently rooted softwood cuttings

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712142022456

Keywords:

nursery tree production, adventitious rooting, Prunus salicina, Prunus, Prunus domestica, rhizome

Abstract

In Brazil, nursery plum trees are traditionally produced by interspecific budding, where the rootstock is propagated by peach seeds often obtained from the waste of peach industrialization, which promotes heterogeneity among rootstocks. In addition, the conventional system of nursery plum tree production under field conditions requires approximately 18 months, from taking seeds to selling grafted trees. This research has aimed to assess the technical feasibility of adventitious root formation in the softwood cuttings of six cultivars of Prunus spp., as well as the budding of ‘Irati’ plum in the recently rooted softwood cuttings developed in a greenhouse, in order to reduce the time required to produce nursery plum trees with cloned rootstocks. Two tests were carried out in a greenhouse involving the rootstock propagation step (1) and the ‘Irati’ plum budding on the recently rooted cuttings (2). Under the experimental conditions adopted, we have concluded that it is technically feasible to propagate the cultivars of Prunus spp. under an intermittent mist system with 22 cm-long softwood cuttings. The cultivars ‘Genovesa’, ‘Marianna 2624’, and ‘Myrobalan 29C’ showed good propagation ability with high percentage of live rooted cuttings (>90%) and low mortality in acclimation (≤5.0%). On the other hand, the budding of the ‘Irati’ plum by the chip budding method made in April in the original rootstock cutting showed low percentages of success (between 17.1% and 31.4%) and the beginning of scion growth was only observed at the end of winter. Considering the time necessary for the softwood cutting to root and the satisfactory growth of the scion for planting the nursery trees at the appropriate time (winter), we could not produce budded nursery trees of ‘Irati’ plum in less than 12 months, counting from the cuttings made.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AGRIANUAL. 2022. Anuário da Agricultura Brasileira. São Paulo: FNP Consultoria & Comércio. 149p.

BENDER A et al. 2021. Qualidade físico-química de ameixas ‘Letícia’ produzidas sobre porta-enxertos clonais e em plantas autoenraizadas, no meio-oeste de Santa Catarina. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias 20: 1-11.

CARDOSO C et al. 2011. AIB e substratos no enraizamento de estacas de pessegueiro ‘Okinawa’ coletadas no outono. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 32: 1307-1314.

CARVALHO RIN et al. 2010. Endodormência de gemas de pessegueiro e ameixeira em região de baixa ocorrência de frio. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 32: 769-777.

CARVALHO RIN & BIASI LA. 2012. Índice para a avaliação da intensidade de dormência de gemas de fruteiras de clima temperado. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 34: 936-940.

CAVICHIOLI JC et al. 2009. Uso de câmara úmida em enxertia hipocotiledonar de maracujazeiro-amarelo sobre três porta-enxertos. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 31: 532-538.

CHAVES RC et al. 2004. Enxertia de maracujazeiro-azedo em estacas herbáceas enraizadas de espécies de Passifloras nativas. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 26: 120-123.

DALBÓ MA & BRUNA ED. 2021. Cultivares de ameixeira. In: DALBÓ MA. (Eds.). A cultura da ameixeira em Santa Catarina. Florianópolis: Epagri. p.31-39.

DICK JMP & LEAKEY RRB. 2006. Differentiation of the dynamic variables affecting rooting ability in juvenile and mature cuttings of cherry (Prunus avium). Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 81: 296-302.

DUCROQUET JPHJ & DALBÓ MA. 2007. SCS 409 Camila e SCS 410 Piuna - Novas cultivares de ameixeira com resistência à escaldadura das folhas. Agropecuária Catarinense 20: 67-70.

DUTRA LF & KERSTEN E. 1996. Efeito do substrato e da época de coleta dos ramos no enraizamento de estacas de ameixeira (Prunus salicina Lindl.). Ciência Rural 26: 361-366.

DUTRA LF et al. 2002. Época de coleta, ácido indolbutírico e triptofano no enraizamento de estacas de pessegueiro. Scientia Agricola 59: 327-333.

FAO. 2022. Countries by commodity. Disponível em: <https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#rankings/countries_by_ commodity>. Acesso em: 25 abr. 2022.

GASPAR T et al. 1992. Practical uses of peroxidase activity as a predictive marker of rooting performance of micropropagated shoots. Agronomie 12: 757-765.

GOMEZ L et al. 2020. Spatial-temporal management of nitrogen and carbon on the peach tree (Prunus persicae L. Batsch.). Scientia Horticulturae 273: 1-13.

GRADZIEL TM. 2003. Interspecific hybridization and subsequent gene introgression within Prunus subgenus amygdalus. Acta Horticulturae 622: 249-255.

GUERRA LJ et al. 1992. Influência do alagamento na mortalidade do pessegueiro e da ameixeira. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 27: 499-508.

GU X et al. 2021. Melatonin enhances the waterlogging tolerance of Prunus persica by modulating antioxidant metabolism and anaerobic respiration. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 40: 2178-2190.

HAIDER MS et al. 2018. Drought stress revealed physiological, biochemical and gene-expressional variations in ‘Yoshihime’ peach (Prunus persica L.) cultivar. Journal of Plant Interactions 13: 83-90.

HARTMANN HT et al. 2002. Plant propagation: principles and practices. 7.ed. New Jersey. Prentice-Hall. 880p.

HEIDE OM. 2008. Interaction of photoperiod and temperature in the control of growth and dormancy of Prunus species. Scientia Horticulturae 115: 309-314.

IBGE. 2017. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística Censo Agro. Disponível em: https://censos.ibge.gov.br/agro/2017/templates/censo_agro/resultadosagro/agricultura.html?localidade=0&tema=78210 Acesso em: 18 nov. 2021.

JIMÉNEZ S et al. 2013. Physiological, biochemical and molecular responses in four Prunus rootstocks submitted to drought stress. Tree Physiology 33: 1061-1075.

JOHNSON EP et al. 2020. Rooting response of Prunus wild relative semi-hardwood cuttings to indole-3-butyric acid potassium salt (KIBA). Scientia Horticulturae 263: 1-7.

KERSTEN E et al. 1994. Enraizamento de ameixeira (Prunus salicina, Lindl.) em diferentes épocas de coleta das estacas. Ciência Rural 25: 169-170.

KRUGNER R & LEDBETTER CA. 2016. Rootstock effects on almond leaf scorch disease incidence and severity. Plant Disease 100: 1617-1621.

LACKMAN KP et al. 2022. Screening for adventitious rooting in clonal selections of peach rootstocks. Amazonian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 65: 1-10.

LANG GA et al. 1987. Endodormancy, Paradormancy, and Ecodormancy: physiological terminology and classification for dormancy research. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 22: 371-377.

MAROLI L et al. 2014. Produção de mudas de videira cv. Bordô/Paulsen 1103 pela enxertia de mesa com estratificação. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 36: 673-679.

MAYER NA et al. 2017. Advances in peach, nectarine and plum propagation. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 39: 1-21.

MAYER NA et al. 2018. Leaf nutrient content on seven plum cultivars with grafted by budding or own-rooted trees. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 40: 1-12.

MAYER NA et al. 2020. Cloning of rootstock selections of Prunus spp. cultivars by softwood cuttings. Scientia Horticulturae 273: 1-11.

MAYER NA et al. 2021. Adventitious rooting of cultivars and clonal selections of Prunus spp. rootstock under intermittent system. Revista Ceres 68: 230-238.

MINDELLO NETO UR & BALBINOT JUNIOR AA. 2004. Enraizamento de estacas herbáceas de pessegueiro, cultivar Jubileu, com imersão rápida em AIB. Revista Agropecuária Catarinense 17: 88-90.

MIRANDA CSD et al. 2004. Enxertia recíproca e aib como fatores indutores do enraizamento de estacas lenhosas dos porta-enxertos de pessegueiro ‘Okinawa’ e Umezeiro. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 28: 778-784.

MOING A & GAUDILLÈRE JP. 1992. Carbon and nitrogen partitioning in peach/plum grafts. Tree Physiology 10: 81-92.

MONDRAGÓN-VALERO A et al. 2017. Physical mechanisms produced in the development of nursery almond trees (Prunus dulcis Miller) as a response to the plant adaptation to different substrates. Rhizosphere 3: 44-49.

MORENO MA et al. 1995. Adesoto 101, a plum rootstock for peaches and other stone fruit. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 30: 1314-1315.

NACHTIGAL JC. 1999. Obtenção de porta-enxertos ‘Okinawa’ e de mudas de pessegueiro (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) utilizando métodos de propagação vegetativa. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia). Jaboticabal: UNESP. 165p.

OLEIRA CM & BROWNING G. 1993. Effect of juvenility status on growth and endogenous IAA and ABA in Prunus avium callus of internodal origin. Journal of Horticultural Science 68: 565-573.

OLIVEIRA I et al. 2018. Compared leaf anatomy and water relations of commercial and traditional Prunus dulcis (Mill.) cultivars under rain-fed conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 229: 226-232.

OPAZO I et al. 2020. Rootstocks modulate the physiology and growth responses to water deficit and long-term recovery in grafted stone fruit trees. Agricultural Water Management 228: 1-11.

OSTERC G et al. 2016. Quantification of IAA metabolites in the early stages of adventitious rooting might be predictive for subsequent differences in rooting response. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 35: 534-542.

OSTERC G & STAMPAR F. 2015. Maturation changes auxin profile during the process of adventitious rooting in Prunus. European Journal of Horticultural Science 80: 225-230.

PAULA LA et al. 2011. Reação de porta-enxertos de pessegueiro à Meloidogyne incognita. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 33: 680-684.

PEREIRA EBC et al. 2002. Avaliação de métodos de enxertia em mudas de mangabeira. Planaltina: Embrapa. 15p. (Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento 50).

PIMENTEL P et al. 2014. Physiological and morphological responses of Prunus species with different degree of tolerance to long-term root hypoxia. Scientia Horticulturae 180: 14-23.

PINOCHET J et al. 1996. Prunus rootstocks evaluation to root-knot and lesion nematodes in Spain. Journal of Nematology 28: 616-623.

PINOCHET J et al. 1999. Resistance of peach and plum rootstocks from Spain, France and Italy to Root-knot Nematode Meloidogyne javanica. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 34: 1259-1262.

RADMANN EB et al. 2014. Interação entre o genótipo e AIB no enraizamento de estacas semilenhosas de porta-enxertos de pessegueiro. Nativa Pesquisas Agrárias e Ambientais 2: 229-233.

RADOVIC M et al. 2020. Influence of rootstocks on the chemical composition of the fruits of plum cultivars. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 92: 1-9.

REGINA MA. 2002. Produção e certificação de mudas de videira na França 2: Técnica de produção de mudas pela enxertia de mesa. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 24: 590-596.

REIG G et al. 2018a. Horticultural, leaf mineral and fruit quality traits of two ‘Greengage’ plum cultivars budded on plum based rootstocks in Mediterranean conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 232: 84-91.

REIG G et al. 2018b. Potential of new Prunus cerasifera based rootstocks for adapting under heavy and calcareous soil conditions. Scientia Horticulturae 234: 193-200.

REIG G et al. 2019. Long-term graft compatibility study of peach-almond hybrid and plum based rootstocks budded with European and Japanese plums. Scientia Horticulturae 243: 392-400.

REIS JMR et al. 2010. Métodos de enxertia e ambientes na produção de mudas de pessegueiro cv. ‘Diamante’. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 40: 200-205.

RIBAS CP et al. 2007. Ácido indolbutírico no enraizamento de estacas semilenhosas das cultivares de pessegueiro Della nona e Eldorado. Scientia Agraria 8: 439-442.

RODRIGUES AC et al. 2002. Peroxidases e fenóis totais em tecidos de porta-enxertos de Prunus sp. nos períodos de crescimento vegetativo e de dormência. Ciência Rural 32: 559-564.

ROSA GGD et al. 2017. Propagação de porta-enxerto de Prunus spp. por estaquia: efeito do genótipo, do estádio de desenvolvimento do ramo e tipo de estaca. Revista Ceres 64: 90-97.

RUBIO-CABETAS MJ et al. 2018. Preformed and induced mechanisms underlies the differential responses of Prunus rootstock to hypoxia. Journal of Plant Physiology 228: 134-149.

SCHWENGBER JE et al. 2002. Utilização de diferentes recipientes na produção da ameixeira através de estacas. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 24: 285-288.

SILVA VAL et al. 2014. Enxertia simultânea com estaquia herbácea na propagação do pessegueiro. Congresso Brasileiro de Fruticultura 23: 1-4.

SMALLEY TJ et al. 1991. Photosynthesis and leaf water, carbohydrate, and hormone status during rooting of stem cuttings of Acer rubrum. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 116: 1052-1057.

SOLARI LI et al. 2006. The relationship of hydraulic conductance to root system characteristics of peach (Prunus persica) rootstocks. Physiologia Plantarum 128: 324-333.

SOTTILE F et al. 2012. Rootstocks evaluation for European and Japanese plum in Italy. Acta Horticulturae 968: 137-146.

STANICA F. 2007. Propagation of Prunus rootstocks by hardwood cuttings on composed rooting substrates. Acta Horticulturae 734: 309-311.

STEFANCIC M et al. 2007. The effects of a fogging system on the physiological status and rooting capacity of leafy cuttings of woody species. Trees 21: 491-496.

SZABÓ V et al. 2014. Effects of biostimulator and leaf fertilizers on Prunus mahaleb L. stockplants and their cuttings. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum 13: 113-125.

TCHOUNDJEU Z et al. 2002. Vegetative propagation of Prunus africana: effects of rooting medium, auxin concentrations and leaf area. Agroforestry Systems 54: 183-192.

TETSUMURA T et al. 2017. Improved rooting of softwood cuttings of dwarfing rootstock for persimmon under fog irrigation. Scientia Horticulturae 224: 150-155.

TIMM CRF et al. 2015. Enraizamento de miniestacas herbáceas de porta-enxertos de pessegueiro sob efeito de ácido indolbutírico. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 36: 135-140.

TOMAZ ZFP et al. 2014. Produção de mudas de pessegueiro via enxertia de gema ativa e dormente em sistema de cultivo sem solo. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 36: 1002-1008.

TONIETTO A et al. 2005. Enraizamento e sobrevivência de mudas de ameixeira produzidas por estaquia. Revista Científica Rural 10: 36-42.

TORO G et al. 2018. Root respiratory componentes of Prunus spp. rootstocks under low oxygen: Regulation of growth, maintenance, and ion uptake respiration. Scientia Horticulturae 239: 259-268.

TSAFOUROS A et al. 2019. Spatial and temporal changes of mineral nutrientes and carbohydrates in cuttings of four stone fruit rootstocks and their contribution to rooting potential. Scientia Horticulturae 253: 227-240.

TSIPOURIDIS C et al. 2006. Rhizogenesis of GF677, Early Crest, May Crest and Arm King stem cuttings during the year in relation to carbohydrate and natural hormone content. Scientia Horticulturae 108: 200-204.

TWORKOSKI T & TAKEDA F. 2007. Rooting response of shoot cuttings from three peach growth habits. Scientia Horticulturae 115: 98-100.

WREGE MS et al. 2005. Zoneamento agroclimático para ameixeira no Rio Grande do Sul. Pelotas: Embrapa. 26p. (Documentos 151).

YAMAMOTO LY et al. 2013. Substratos no enraizamento de estacas herbáceas de amora-preta Xavante. Ciência Rural 43: 15-20.

ZHANG Z et al. 2018. Transcriptome profiles reveal the crucial roles of hormone and sugar in the bud dormancy of Prunus mume. Scientific Reports 8: 1-15.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-12

How to Cite

NICOLAO, Guilherme; LACKMAN, Karen Pinheiro; MAYER, Newton Alex; BIANCHI, Valmor João. Vegetative propagation of rootstocks and budding of ‘Irati’ Japanese plum in recently rooted softwood cuttings. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 21, n. 4, p. 456–467, 2022. DOI: 10.5965/223811712142022456. Disponível em: https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/21830. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Article - Science of Plants and Derived Products