Corn fertilization with triple superphosphate in a Typic Hapludox soil under the residual effect of alternative phosphorus sources
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711722018166Keywords:
available phosphorus, phosphate residue, soil acidityAbstract
In variable-charge soils, the use of alternative phosphorus sources may influence further soluble phosphate fertilization. This study aimed to evaluate phosphorus (P) availability for corn plants in response to triple superphosphate fertilization (TSP) in a Typic Hapludox (Oxisol) soil with residual P from alternative sources. The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse under a completely randomized design and 2x4x5 factorial scheme, with four replications. Treatments consisted of five TSP doses (0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 mg dm-3 P), and two sequential corn croppings with and without liming; the area was previously grown with Urochloa spp. and fertilized with precipitated phosphate-1 (PP1), precipitated phosphate-2 (PP2), natural reactive phosphate (NRP), and TSP at 120 mg dm-3. The P from TSP has its dynamics within the soil-plant system and fertilization efficiency in corn crops altered by the residual effect of P from alternative sources and by soil acidity correctives. The residual effects of PP2 and NRP, dry matter yield and P accumulation in corn were higher for TSP doses above 30 mg dm-3, being greater in the first cropping and in limed soils. Yet for PP2 and NRP residual effects, the highest soil availability of P was registered after the two sequential cropping in both acidity conditions, thus showing an enhanced residual effect.
Downloads
References
BORTOLON L et al. 2016. Degree of phosphorus saturation threshold for minimization P losses by runoff in cropland soils of Southern Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 51: 1088-1098.
BRASIL. 1983. Ministério da Agricultura. Análise de corretivos, fertilizantes e inoculantes: métodos oficiais. Brasília, Secretaria Nacional de Defesa Agropecuária. 104p.
BRASIL. 2015. Ministério da Fazenda. Panorama do mercado de fertilizantes. Brasília, Secretaria de Acompanhamento Econômico – SEAE. 35p.
CARVALHO WA et al. 1983. Levantamento de solos da Fazenda Lageado Estação Experimental “Presidente Médici”. Boletim Científico da Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas UNESP, Botucatu. 95p.
BOLAN N et al. 2013. Phosphorus-arsenic interactions in variable-charge soils in relation to arsenic mobility and bioavailability. Science of the Total Environment 463: 1154-1162.
CHIEN SH et al. 2011. Agronomic and environmental aspects of phosphate fertilizers varying in source and solubility: an update review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 89: 229-255.
EMBRAPA. 1997. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Centro Nacional de Pesquisa de Solos. Manual de métodos de análise do solo. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro. 212p.
FERNANDES DM et al. 2015. Fósforo na solução do solo em resposta à aplicação de fertilizantes fluidos mineral e organomineral. Irriga 1: 14-27.
FINK JR et al. 2016. Adsorption and desorption of phosphorus in subtropical soils as affected by management system and mineralogy. Soil and Tillage Research 155: 62-68.
FOLONI JSS et al. 2008. Aplicação de Fosfato Natural e Reciclagem de Fósforo por Milheto, Braquiária, Milho e Soja. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 32: 1147-1155.
FONTOURA SMV et al. 2010. Eficiência técnica de fertilizantes fosfatados em Latossolo sob plantio direto. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 34: 1907-1914.
HOROWITZ N & MEURER EJ. 2003. Eficiência de dois fosfatos naturais farelados em função do tamanho da partícula. Ciência Rural 33: 41-47.
MALAVOLTA E et al. 1997. Avaliação do estado nutricional das plantas: princípios e aplicações. 2.ed. Piracicaba: Potafos. 319p.
MERLIN A et al. 2014. Congo grass grown in rotation with soybean affects phosphorus bound to soil carbon. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 38: 888-895.
MONTALVO D et al. 2015. Agronomic Effectiveness of Granular and Fluid Phosphorus Fertilizers in Andisols and Oxisols. Soil Science Society of America Journal 79: 577-584.
OLIVEIRA LB et al. 2014. Formas de fósforo no solo sob pastagens naturais submetidas à adição de fosfatos. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 38: 867-878.
RAIJ BV et al. 2001. Análise química para avaliação da fertilidade de solos tropicais. Campinas: Instituto Agronômico. 285p.
RESENDE AV et al. 2006. Fontes e modos de aplicação de fósforo para o milho em solo cultivado da região do cerrado. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 30: 453-466.
SALAZAR-CAMACHO C & VILLALOBOS M. 2010. Goethite surface reactivity: III. Unifying arsenate adsorption behavior through a variable crystal face - Site density model. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 74: 2257-2280.
SHUAI X & ZINATI G. 2009. Proton charge and adsorption of humic acid and phosphate on goethite. Soil Science Society of America Journal 73: 2013-2020.
SOUZA RM et al. 2014. Eficiência agronômica de fosfatos de rocha em solo com elevado teor de cálcio trocável. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 38: 1816-1825.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Journal of Agroveterinary Sciences)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.
c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.
