Management to reduce losses in canola pre-harvest under high rainfall
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711722018219Keywords:
Brassica napus L. var. oleifera, Hyola 61, grain yieldAbstract
Canola stands out as an important economic alternative as it is a source for the production of oil for human consumption, and in its use for the production of biodiesel. However mechanized harvesting is an obstacle to the expansion of the cultivation of this brassicaceae that need to be solved. The objective of this work was to evaluate five canola mechanized harvesting management systems, with or without the application of a sealant, compared to losses of preharvest and harvest, grain yield and water content in the grains. The canola hybrid Hyola 61 was used, being seeded with row spacing of 0.45 meters, and density of 40 viable seeds m-2. The treatments resulted from the combination of different management processes combined with a sealant. The adopted managements were: M1- harvesting with cut straight to the natural maturation point (untreated); M2 - previous chemical desiccation with diquat; M3 - previous chemical desiccation with ammonium glufosinate; M4 - cut-windrowing, and M5 - ethefom application. The harvest managements with cut-windrowing, previous chemical desiccation, and applying etefom, singly or in combination to sealant, reduced the grain losses in the harvest allowing higher yields to be obtained, and also reducing the water content in the grains, under conditions of excessive rainfall.Downloads
References
BOLLER W et al. 2012. Colheita complicada. Cultivar Máquinas 11: 10-13.
CANOLA. 2012. When to Swath, Winnipeg. Disponível em: http://canola.okstate.edu/cropproduction/ harvesting/canola_swathing_guide.pdf. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2016.
CANOLA. 2014. Swathing, Combining. Canola Council of Canada, Winnipeg. Disponível em: https://www.canolacouncil.org/canola-encyclopedia/managing-harvest/harvest-management/. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2016.
CONAB. 2013. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Acompanhamento da Safra Brasileira de Grãos: safra 2012/2013. Disponível em: http://www.conab.gov.br/OlalaCMS/uploads/arquivos/13_09_10_16_05_53_boletim_portugues_setembro_2013.pdf. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2016.
CONTERJNIC S et al. 1991. Colza: cultivo, cosecha y comercialización. Buenos Aires: Departamento de Estudos y Prensa y Difusión de AACREA, CREA. 1991. 18 p. (Fascículo de divulgación).
DE MORI C et al. 2014. Aspectos econômicos e conjunturais da cultura da canola no mundo e no Brasil. Documento Online 149. Embrapa Trigo. Disponível em: https://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/handle/doc/988475. Acesso em 11 jun.2016.
ESFAHANI M et al. 2012. Effects of pre-harvest application of parquat on grain moisture reduction, grain yield and quality of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Caspian Journal of Enviromental Sciences 10: 75-82.
GARRAFA M. 2005. Aplicação de FMEA na otimização dos fatores de produção da cultura da canola. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia da Produção). Santa Maria: UFSM. 166p.
HAILE TA et al. 2014. On-farm seed loss does not differ between windrowed and direct-harvested canola. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 94: 785-789.
KRÜGER CAMB et al. 2011. Arranjo de plantas na expressão dos componentes da produtividade de grãos de canola. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 46: 1448-1453.
LACERDA ALS et al. 2003. Aplicação de dessecantes na cultura da soja: teor de umidade nas sementes e biomassa nas plantas. Planta Daninha 21: 427-434.
PARI L et al. 2012. The harvest of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): The effective yield losses at on-farm scale in the Italian area. Biomass and Bioenergy 46: 453-458.
PORTELLA JA & TOMM GO. 2007. Enleiramento e colheita de canola. Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo. (Embrapa Trigo. Documentos Online, 89). Disponível em: http://www.cnpt.embrapa.br/biblio/do/p_do89.htm. Acesso em: 5 jun. 2016.
SANCHES FR. 2000. Aplicação de biorreguladores vegetais: aspectos fisiológicos e aplicações práticas na citricultura mundial. Jaboticabal: FUNEP. 160p.
TOMM GO et al. 2009. Panorama atual e indicações para aumento de eficiência da produção de canola no Brasil. Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo (Embrapa Trigo. Documentos Online, 118). Disponível em: http://www.cnpt.embrapa.br/biblio/do/p_do118.htm. Acesso em: 22 jun. 2016.
TOMM GO. 2005. Situação em 2005 e perspectivas da cultura de canola no Brasil e em países vizinhos. Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo. 21p.
WENDLER C et al. 1992. Effect of glufosinate (phosphinothricin) and inhibitors of photorespiration on photosynthesis and ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity. Journal of Plant Physiology 139: 666-671.
ZONEAMENTO. 2012. Zoneamento Agrícola Risco Climático para a cultura de canola no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (safra 2012). Embrapa Trigo, Passo Fundo. Disponível em: http://sistemasweb.agricultura.gov.br/sislegis/action/detalhaAto.do?method=visualizarAtoPortalMapa&chave=457545640. Acesso em: 23 jun. 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Journal of Agroveterinary Sciences)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.
c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.
