Bacillus coagulans as an alternative to antibiotics in the performance and control of Salmonella Enteritidis in broilers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712132022290Keywords:
additives, poultry, salmonellosis, intestinal contaminationAbstract
The use of antimicrobial growth promoters in broiler feed has been beneficial for improving performance and preventing diseases. However, the indiscriminate use of these products in the feed can result in the development of resistant bacteria, the accumulation of residues in the products, and an imbalance in the microflora of birds. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate alternatives, such as beneficial microorganisms that improve microbial growth without affecting animal health and product quality. This research aimed to evaluate the supplementation with the probiotic Bacillus coagulans on the performance, carcass characteristics, and health of broilers from seven to 42 days. In total, 720 broilers were used, distributed in a randomized block design with six treatments and eight replicates. The evaluated treatments were as follows: Control ration (RC); PROB1 (Probiotic 400 g/t); PROB2 (Probiotic 400 g/t until 21 days and 200 g/t from 22 to 42 days); RC + antibiotic; RC + Salmonella inoculation; PROB1 + Salmonella inoculation. The treatments did neither influence feed intake, carcass yield, and cuts nor the incidence of injuries to the chest, hock, and footpad. Weight gain and feed conversion were better in birds that received antibiotic or probiotic diets. There was an incidence of Salmonella in the e challenges excreta at 42 days only in the treatment with challenge without adding probiotics. We conclude that the probiotic Bacillus coagulans can be used as an alternative to antibiotics in the diet of broilers as it facilitates similar performance and is efficient in the control of Salmonella Enteritidis.
Downloads
References
AHMED ST et al. 2014. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as a probiotic strain on growth performance, cecal microflora, and fecal noxious gas emissions of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 93: 1963-1971.
BAMI MK et al. 2019. Effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles and Bacillus coagulans as probiotic on growth, histomorphology of intestine, and immune parameters in broiler chickens. Comparative Clinical Pathology 27: 399-406.
BAI K et al. 2017. Supplemental effects of probiotic Bacillus subtilis fmbJ on growth performance, antioxidant capacity, and meat quality of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 96: 74-82.
DERSJANT-LI YK et al. 2015. Effect of multienzymes in combination with a direct-fed microbial on performance and welfare parameters in broilers under commercial production settings. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 24: 80-90.
DIARRA MS & MALOUIN F. 2014. Antibiotics in Canadian poultry productions and anticipated alternatives. Frontiers in Microbiology 5: 282.
FLORES C et al. 2016. Direct-fed microbial and its combination with xylanase, amylase, and protease enzymes in comparison with AGPs on broiler growth performance and foot-pad lesion development. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 25: 328-337.
HUNG AT et al. 2012. Effects of Bacillus coagulans ATCC 7050 on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and microflora composition in broiler chickens. Animal Production Science 52: 874-879.
JAYARAMAN S et al. 2013. Bacillus subtilis PB6 improves intestinal health of broiler chickens challenged with Clostridium perfringes - induced necrotic enteritis. Poultry Science 92: 370-374.
JONG IC et al. 2014. Wet litter not only induces footpad dermatitis but also reduces overall welfare, technical performance, and carcass yield in broiler chickens. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 23: 51-58.
KHAN RU & NAZ S. 2013. The applications of probiotics in poultry production. World's Poultry Science Journal 69: 621-632.
KURITZA LN et al. 2014. Probióticos na avicultura. Ciência Rural 44: 1457-1465.
LI G et al. 2010. An outbreak of gangrenous dermatitis in commercial broiler chickens. Avian Pathology 39: 247-253.
LIANG WZ et al. 2014. Ammonia fate and transport mechanisms in broiler litter. Water, Air & Soil Pollution 225: 1-9.
NASEEM S & KING AJ. 2018. Ammonia production in poultry houses can affect health of humans, birds, and the environment - Techniques for its reduction during poultry production. Environmental Science and Poultry Research 25: 15269-15293.
PAIÃO FG et al. 2013. Detection of Salmonella spp, Salmonella Enteritidis and Typhimurium in naturally infected broiler chickens by a multiplex PCR-based assay. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology 44: 37-41.
PARK JW et al. 2016. Effect of dietary supplementation with a probiotic (Enterococcus faecium) on production performance, excreta microflora, ammonia emission, and nutrient utilization in ISA brown laying hens. Poultry Science 95: 2829-2835.
RAMOS LSN et al. 2014. Aditivos alternativos a antibióticos para frangos de corte no período de 22 a 42 dias de idade. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal 15: 897-906.
ROSTAGNO HS et al. 2017. Tabelas Brasileiras para Aves e Suínos - Composição de Alimentos e Exigências Nutricionais. 4.ed. Viçosa: UFV. p. 451-488.
SILVA GV et al. 2018. Performance and carcass yield of female broilers fed with dietas containing probiotics and symbiotics as an alternative to growth enhancers. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 40: 1-6.
STELLA AE et al. 2021. Salmonelose aviária. Research, Society and Development 10: 1-13.
SOARES VM et al. 2020. Salmonella em frangos e a contaminação cruzada por meio de superfícies de corte em cozinhas domésticas. Veterinária e Zootecnia 27: 1-12.
TRALDI AB et al. 2007. Avaliação de probióticos na dieta de frangos de corte criados em cama nova ou reutilizada. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 36: 660-665.
WHO. 2018. World Health Organization. Salmonella (non-typhoidal). Available in: www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/salmonella-(non-typhoidal). Access in: 10 Jun. 2020.
WANG H et al. 2017. Live probiotic Lactobacillus johnsonii BS15 promotes growth performance and lowers fat deposition by improving lipid metabolism, intestinal development, and gut microflora in broilers. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 1073.
WANG Y & GU Q. 2010. Effect of probiotic on growth performance and digestive enzyme activity of Arbor Acres broilers. Research in veterinary science 89: 163-167.
WELFARE QUALITY®. 2009. Assessment protocol for cattle. Lelystad: Consortium. Available in: https://edepot.wur.nl/233467. Access in: 4 mar. 2020.
XU L et al. 2017. Bacillus coagulans enhance the immune function of the intestinal mucosa of yellow broilers. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 19: 115-122.
ZHANG ZF & KIM IH. 2013. Effects of probiotic supplementation in different energy and nutrient density diets on performance, egg quality, excreta microflora, excreta noxious gas emission, and serum cholesterol concentrations in laying hens. Journal of Animal Science 91: 4781-4787.
ZHEN W et al. 2018. Effect of dietary Bacillus coagulans supplementation on growth performance and immune responses of broiler chickens challenged by Salmonella Enteritidis. Poultry Science 978: 2654-2666.
SUMIATI ADZ & NAHROWI KGW. 2020. Effects of dietary Bacillus coagulans d3372 supplementation as probiotics on broiler performance, ileal microflora, meat quality, nutrient retention, and metabolizable energy. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 8: 115-123.
ZIBA MW et al. 2020. Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella spp. in broiler chicken neck skin from slaughterhouses in Zambia. Journal of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health 12: 85-90.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Authors & Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.
c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.