Alternative herbicides to paraquat in pre-harvest desiccation of soybean plants

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712322024196

Keywords:

diquat, glufosinate, saflufenacil, carfentrazone, defoliation, yield

Abstract

Diquat, glufosinate and the combination of the latter with carfentrazone or saflufenacil are believed to be as effective for pre-harvest desiccation of soybean plants as paraquat. This work was developed with the objective of evaluating the efficacy of paraquat, diquat, and glufosinate alone or at mixtures of carfentrazone or saflufenacil in pre-harvest desiccation of soybean. Soybean defoliation, maturity and yield were evaluated. Similar efficacy was observed between glufosinate and paraquat in soybean defoliation and maturity, in addition to a greater flexibility of use, in which it could be an anticipator and standardizing agent of the harvest. The application of diquat (200 g of active ingredient [a.i.] ha-1), paraquat (200 g a.i. ha-1) or glufosinate (400 or 500 g a.i. ha-1) was effective for pre-harvest desiccation of soybean at the R7.2 stage. As well, it was observed promising results for application of glufosinate + saflufenacil (300 + 24.5 g a.i. ha-1), glufosinate + carfentrazone (200 + 25 g a.i. ha-1), glufosinate + saflufenacil (200 + 35 g a.i. ha-1). Diquat and glufosinate can replace paraquat in pre-harvest desiccation of soybean plants, and glufosinate also provide greater management flexibility, in anticipating the harvest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANVISA. 2020. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. RDC nº 428. Diretoria colegiada – Anvisa. Available at: https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/resolucao-de-diretoria-colegiada-rdc-n-428-de-7-de-outubro-de-2020-*-283497088. Accessed at: 10 Jun. 2021.

ALBRECHT AJP et al. 2020. Metabolic changes, agronomic performance, and quality of seeds in soybean with the pat gene after application of glufosinate. Weed Science 68: 594-604.

ALBRECHT AJP et al. 2022a. Agronomic implications of paraquat ban in Brazil. Advances in Weed Science 40: e020220040.

ALBRECHT LP et al. 2022b. Glufosinate and diquat in pre-harvest desiccation of soybean at four phenological stages, and their impact on seed quality. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 82: 448-456.

ALBRECHT LP et al. 2023. Formulações de glufosinate na dessecação pré-colheita da soja. Nativa 11: 96-100.

APARECIDO LEO et al. 2016. Köppen, Thornthwaite and Camargo climate classifications for climatic zoning in the State of Paraná, Brazil. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 40: 405-417.

BARNETT KA et al. 2012. Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) control in WideStrike® flex cotton. Weed Technology 26: 611-616.

BOUDREAUX JM & GRIFFIN JL. 2011. Application timing of harvest aid herbicides affects soybean harvest and yield. Weed Technology 25: 38-43.

BROMILOW RH. 2004. Paraquat and sustainable agriculture. Pest Management Science 60: 340-349.

DELGADO CML et al. 2015. Mobilization of reserves and vigor of soybean seeds under desiccation with glufosinate ammonium. Journal of Seed Science 37: 154-161.

ERGIN N & KAYA M. 2020. The effectiveness of herbicidal desiccants and application times on seed yield and earliness of soybean. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 48: 1465-1472.

FEHR WR et al. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Science 11: 929-931.

FERREIRA DF. 2011. Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 35: 1039-1042.

FINOTO EL et al. 2017. Anticipation and harvest delay in oil and protein contents of soybean seeds, grow crops Valiosa RR. Scientia Agropecuaria 8: 99-107.

HAWKES TR. 2014. Mechanisms of resistance to paraquat in plants. Pest Management Science 70: 1316-1323.

HIRANO M et al. 2010. Validation of diagrammatic scale for estimating defoliation caused by the Asian rust in soybeans. Summa Phytopathologica 36: 248-250.

PEREIRA IS et al. 2020. Harvest-aid herbicides influence soybean seed yield, quality and oxidative metabolism. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 15: e7022.

PEREIRA T et al. 2015. Chemical desiccation for early harvest in soybean cultivars. Semina. Ciências Agrárias 36: 2383-2394.

TAKANO HK et al. 2019. Reactive oxygen species trigger the fast action of glufosinate. Planta 249: 1837-1849.

TAKANO HK et al. 2020a. A novel insight into the mode of action of glufosinate: how reactive oxygen species are formed. Photosynthesis Research 144: 361-372.

TAKANO HK et al. 2020b. Glufosinate enhances the activity of protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors. Weed Science 68: 324-332.

ZAGONEL J. 2005. Herbicide application timing in preharvest desiccation of soybean cultivars with different growth habits. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part B 40: 13-20.

ZANATTA E et al. 2018. Pre-harvest desiccation: Productivity and physical and physiological inferences on soybean seeds during storage. Journal of Agricultural Science 10: 354-362.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-13

How to Cite

ALBRECHT, Leandro Paiola; ALBRECHT, Alfredo Junior Paiola; LORENZETTI, Juliano Bortoluzzi; SILVA, André Felipe Moreira; YOKOYAMA, Andressa Sayuri; KOSINSKI, Rogerio; MILLEO, Rafael; KATAKURA, Marcelo. Alternative herbicides to paraquat in pre-harvest desiccation of soybean plants. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 23, n. 2, p. 196–202, 2024. DOI: 10.5965/223811712322024196. Disponível em: https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/24730. Acesso em: 26 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Article - Science of Plants and Derived Products