Economic viability of irrigated cultivation of table cassava cultivars under phosphate fertilization

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712222023173

Keywords:

Manihot esculenta, Genotypes, Phosphorus, Production costs, Profitability

Abstract

Phosphate fertilization of cassava cultivars leads to increased production costs that may be economically viable depending on the quantity used and the corresponding productivity. In this sense, the objective of the work was to analyse the economic viability of the irrigated cultivation of table cassava cultivars in response to the application of phosphorus doses in the Brazilian semiarid region. Two agricultural crops were conducted at the Experimental Farm Rafael Fernandes, Mossoró, RN, from June 2018 to April 2019 and from June 2019 to April 2020. The experimental design was in randomized blocks arranged in subdivided plots, with four replications. The doses of phosphorus (0, 60, 120, 180, and 240 kg ha-1 of P2O5) were applied to the plots and the table cassava cultivars (Água Morna, BRS Gema de Ovo, Recife and Venâncio) arranged in the subplots. The total costs for one hectare of cultivation were estimated and the gross income, net income, rate of return, and profitability index were calculated. The use of phosphate fertilizer was economically viable for the cassava cultivars studied in the two crops. The cultivars Água Morna, BRS Gema de Ovo, and Recife are the best cultivation options for the semiarid region of Rio Grande do Norteas they give high yields with the highest profitability. The Recife cultivar was the region's most profitable cultivation, with a profit ranging from R$ 40,331.07 ha-1 to R$ 57,603.46 ha-1 in both seasons, with an average recommendation of 120 kg ha-1 of P2O5.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALVARADO AO & CRUZ AA. 2016. Viabilidad económica de producción de yuca industrial versus ganado en Sucre, Colombia. Revista iPecege 2: 7-23.

ALVARES CA et al. 2013. Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22: 711-728.

ALVES RNB et al. 2012. Doses de NPK na adubação de mandioca (Manihot esculenta, L) variedade Paulozinho em Moju – Pará. Revista Raízes e Amidos Tropicais 8: 65-70.

ALVES FILHO PPC et al. 2015. Resposta da cultivar de mandioca roxinha à adubação NPK. Revista Raízes e Amidos Tropicais 11: 1-7.

BNB. 2020. Banco do Nordeste do Brasil. Available in: https://bnb.gov.br/. Accessed in: 06 july 2020.

BUHARI AK. 2017. Profitability of cassava (Manihot esculenta) production in Kebbi State. Ambit Journal of Agricultural Research 2: 85-93.

BURGOS ÂM & CENÓZ PJ. 2012. Efectos de la aplicación de fósforo y potasio en la producción y calidad de raíces de mandioca (Manihot esculenta Crantz) en un suelo arenoso y clima subtropical. Revista Científica UDO Agrícola 12: 143-151.

CARVALHO FM et al. 2007. Manejo de solo em cultivo com mandioca em treze municípios da Região Sudoeste da Bahia. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 31: 378-384.

CARVALHO FM et al. 2009. Sistemas de produção de mandioca em treze municípios da Região Sudoeste da Bahia. Bragantia 68: 699-702.

CONAB. 2010. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Custos de produção agrícola: a metodologia da CONAB. Brasília: CONAB. 60p.

CUVACA IB et al. 2017. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizer effects on cassava tuber yield in the coastal district of Dondo, Mozambique. African Journal of Agricultural Research 12: 3112-3119.

DONAGEMA GK et al. 2011. Manual de métodos de análises de solos. 2.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Embrapa Solos. p. 43-49.

EBUKIBA E. 2010. Economic analysis of cassava production (farming) in Akwa Ibom State. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 1: 612-614.

ENIMU S et al. 2016. Profitability analysis of cassava production in Cross-River State, Nigeria. International Research Journal of Human Resources and Social Sciences. 3: 210-224.

FAOSTAT. 2017. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United States. Available in: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home. Acessed in: 04 feb. 2020.

FERMONT AM et al. 2010. False beliefs on the socio-economic drivers of cassava cropping. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30: 433-444.

FERREIRA DF. 2014. Sisvar: a Guide for its Bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Ciênc. agrotec. 38: 109-112.

FIDALSKI J. 1999. Respostas da mandioca à adubação NPK e calagem em solos arenosos do noroeste do Paraná. Pesquisa agropecuária brasileira 34: 1353-1359.

GOMES JC et al. 2006. Aspectos socioeconômicos e agronômicos da mandioca. Cruz das Almas: Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura Tropical. p. 215-239.

IBGE. 2018. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Produção Agrícola Municipal. Available in: https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/pam/tabelas. Acessed in: 04 feb. 2020.

ISITOR SU et al. 2017. An Analysis of Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Cassava Farmers in Anambra State, Nigeria. Applied Tropical Agriculture 22: 10-15.

ITAM KO et al. 2018. Comparative cost and return analysis of cassava production by adopters and non-adopters of improved cassava varieties among farmers in Ibesikpo Asutan Lga, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Global Journal of Agricultural Sciences 17: 33-41.

ITAM KO et al. 2014. Analysis of Determinants of Cassava Production and Profitability in Akpabuyo Local Government Area of Cross River State, Nigeria Kingsley Okoi Itam. International Business Research 7: 12.

JANDEL SCIENTIFIC. 1991. Table Curve: curve fitting software. Corte Madera: Jandel Scientific. 280p.

KAWA NC et al. 2013. Manioc Varietal Diversity, Social Networks, and Distribution Constraints in Rural Amazonia. Current Anthropology 54: 764-770.

LIMA AG et al. 2018. Produtividade de mandioca avaliada sobre adubação fosfatada e adubação de cobertura. PUBVET 12: 1-4.

NZEH EC & UGWU JN. 2014. Economic Analysis of Production and Marketing of Cassava in Akoko North-West Local Government Area of Ondo State, Nigeria. Research Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Management 3: 310-314.

OGUNLEYE S et al. 2017. Assessment of profitability and efficiency of cassava production among government and non-government assisted farmers association in Osun State, Nigeria. African Journal of Rural Development 2: 225-233.

OJIAKO AI et al. 2017. Determinants of productivity of smallholder farmers supplying cassava to starch processors in Nigeria: a baseline evidence. RJOAS 2: 62.

OLORUNSANYA EO. 2014. A Gender based Economic Analysis of Cassava Production in North Central Nigeria: Implication for Poverty Alleviation in Nigeria. Albanian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 13: 66-71.

OMOTAYO AO & OLADEJO AJ. 2016. Profitability of Cassava-based Production Systems. Journal of Human Ecology 56: 196-203.

OTSUBO AA et al. 2002. Caracterização da produção, comercialização e consumo da mandioca (Manihot esculenta Crantz) de mesa em Dourados, MS. Ensaios e Ciência: Ciências Biológicas, Agrárias e da Saúde 6: 35-47.

RÊGO LGS et al. 2016. Pedogenesis and soil classification of an experimental farm in Mossoró, state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. Revista Caatinga 29: 1036-1042.

SHEN J et al. 2011. Phosphorus Dynamics: From Soil to Plant. Plant Physiology 156: 997-1005.

SILVA JR & CHABARIBERY D. 2006. Coeficientes técnicos e custo de produção da mandioca para mesa na região de Mogi-Mirim, Estado de São Paulo. Informações Econômicas 36.

SILVA ADA & GOMES RVA. 2008. Macaxeira. In: CAVALCANTI FJA et al. Recomendações de adubação para o Estado de Pernambuco: 2ª aproximação. 3.ed. Recife: Instituto Agronômico de Pernambuco. p.164.

SILVA AF et al. 2013. Comportamento de variedades de mandioca submetidas a fertilização em comunidades dependentes de chuva no semiárido brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Agroecologia 8: 221-235.

SILVA FC. 2009. Manual de análises químicas de solos, plantas e fertilizantes. 2.ed. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica.

SILVA VP et al. 2017. Custo e lucratividade da produção de mandioca convencional versus alternativa em Bom Jesus-RN. Holos 08.

SOUZA RF et al. 2014. Analise econômica no cultivo da mandioca. Revista Verde de Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Sustentável 9: 345-354.

SYSTAT SOFTWARE. 2011. SigmaPlot for Windows Version 12.0. San Jose: Systat Software Inc.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31

How to Cite

SILVEIRA, Flávio Pereira da Mota; LOPES, Welder de Araújo Rangel; ALVES, Francisco Adênio Teixeira; BARBOZA, Michele; SILVA, José Artur da; SOUZA, Ênio Gomes Flôr; SILVEIRA, Lindomar Maria da; BARROS JÚNIOR, Aurélio Paes. Economic viability of irrigated cultivation of table cassava cultivars under phosphate fertilization. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 22, n. 2, p. 173–185, 2023. DOI: 10.5965/223811712222023173. Disponível em: https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/23335. Acesso em: 21 dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Article - Science of Plants and Derived Products

Most read articles by the same author(s)