Nutrient solutions in the production of strawberry seedlings and their influence on agronomic performance

Authors

  • Andressa Vighi Schiavon Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Eloi Evandro Delazeri Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS.
  • Tais Barbosa Becker Embrapa Clima Temperado, Pelotas, RS.
  • Paulo Mello-Farias Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS.
  • Luís Eduardo Correa Antunes Embrapa Clima Temperado, Pelotas, RS.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712022021159

Keywords:

soilless system, phenology, Fragaria x ananassa, plug plant

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the agronomic performance of strawberry cultivars established from plug plant plantlets produced with different nutrient solutions in a soilless system. The experiments were carried out in a greenhouse using seedlings of the Aromas and Camarosa cultivars, produced with four different nutrient solutions. Two cycles were evaluated. In the first, from April 2017 to March 2018, the agronomic performance of two cultivars (Camarosa and Aromas) and four nutrient solutions (NS1, NS2, NS3, and NS4) was assessed in a 2 x 4 factorial scheme. In the second cycle, from April to December 2018, two cultivars (Camarosa and Aromas) and two nutrients solutions (NS3 and NS4) were evaluated in a 2 x 2 factorial scheme. In both cycles, phenological, productive variables and the dry matter of leaves, crowns, and stolons were evaluated. The use of different nutrient solutions in the tip production stage did not influence most of the analyzed variables since the strawberry cycle is long, so their effects end up being diluted over time. However, the effect of the cultivar factor was significant, and, in general, the Camarosa cultivar was more precocious than the Aromas regarding the phenological variables related to flowering, fruiting, and tipping. The cultivars presented fruit production similar to each other in the two crop cycles, with Camarosa presenting greater production of dry matter of leaves and stolons than the Aromas cultivar.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANTUNES LEC et al. 2015. Morangos do jeito que o consumidor gosta. Campo & Negócios - Anuário Hortifruti 1: 64-72.

BECKER TB. 2017. Produção de mudas de morangueiro fora do solo sob diferentes concentrações de nitrogênio nas matrizes e datas de plantio das mudas na Região Sul do RS. Dissertação (Mestrado em Agronomia). Pelotas: UFPEL. 107p.

BRADFORD E et al. 2010. Interactions of temperature and photoperiod determine expression of repeat flowering in strawberry. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 135: 102-107.

COCCO C et al. 2011. Crown size and transplant type on the strawberry yield. Scientia Agricola 68: 489-493.

COCCO C. 2014. Produção e qualidade de mudas e frutas de morangueiro no Brasil e na Itália. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia). Pelotas: UFPEL. 124p.

DAL PICIO M et al. 2013. Fruit yield of strawberry sto¬ck plants after runner tip production by different cultivars. Horticultura Brasileira 31: 375-379.

DIEL MI et al. 2017. Phyllochron and phenology of strawberry cultivars from different origins cultivated in organic substracts. Scientia Horticulturae 220: 226-232.

DIEL MI et al. 2018. Cultivation of strawberry in substrate: Productivity and fruit quality are affected by the cultivar origin and substrates. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 42: 229-239.

FAGHERAZZI AF et al. 2017. Strawberry production progress in Brazil. Acta Horticulturae 1156: 937-940.

FAO. 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Crops. Agricultural Production/strawberry. Disponível em: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home. Acesso em: 10 out. 2020.

FURLANI PR & FERNANDEZ JÚNIOR F. 2004. Cultivo hidropônico de morango em ambiente protegido. In: II Simpósio Nacional do Morango & Encontro de Pequenas Frutas e Frutas Nativas do Mercosul. Anais... Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado. p.102-115.

GIMÉNEZ G et al. 2008. Cultivo sem solo no morangueiro. Ciência Rural 38: 273-279.

GONÇALVES MA. 2015. Produção de mudas de morangueiro e comportamento a campo. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia). Pelotas: UFPEL. 153p.

GONÇALVES MA & ANTUNES LEC. 2016. Mudas Sadias: o início do sucesso no cultivo de morango. Campo & Negócios - Hortifruti 128: 48-51.

HEIDE OM et al. 2013. Physiology and genetics of flowering in cultivated and wild strawberries - a review. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 88: 1-18.

JANISCH DI et al. 2008. Produção de frutos do morangueiro em diferentes épocas de plantio em Santa Maria, RS. Horticultura Brasileira 26: 975-1978.

MARTÍNEZ-FERRI E et al. 2016. Water relations, growth and physiological response of seven strawberry cultivars (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) to different water availability. Agricultural Water Management 164: 73-82.

OLIVEIRA ACB & ANTUNES LEC. 2016. Melhoramento genético e principais cultivares. In: ANTUNES LEC et al. Morangueiro. Brasília: Embrapa. p.134-147.

PEIL RMN et al. 2018. Cultivo do morangueiro em substrato: aspectos técnicos e ambientais de sistemas abertos e fechados. In: XIII Encontro e V Simpósio Latino-Americano de Hidroponia. Anais ... Florianópolis: Tribo da Ilha. p.24-50.

SERÇE S & HANCOCK JF. 2005. The temperature and photoperiod regulation of flowering and runnering in the strawberries, Fragaria chiloensis, F. virginiana, and F. x ananassa. Scientia Horticulturae 103: 167-177.

SONNEVELD C & STRAVER N. 1994. Nutrient solutions for vegetables and flowers grown in water or substrates. The Netherlands: Proefstation voor Tuinbouw onder Glas Te Naaldwijk. 45p.

STRASSBURGER AS et al. 2010. Crescimento e produtividade de cultivares de morangueiro de “dia neutro” em diferentes densidades de plantio em sistema de cultivo orgânico. Bragantia 69: 623-630.

TAZZO IF et al. 2015. Exigência térmica de duas seleções e quatro cultivares de morangueiro cultivado no planalto catarinense. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 37: 550-558.

VERDIAL MF et al. 2007. Vernalização em cinco cultivares de morangueiro. Ciência Rural 37: 976-981.

VIGNOLO GK. 2015. Produção e qualidade de morangos durante dois ciclos consecutivos em função da data de poda, tipo de filme do túnel baixo e cor do mulching plástico. Tese (Doutorado em Agronomia). Pelotas: UFPEL. 124p.

Published

2021-07-02

How to Cite

SCHIAVON, Andressa Vighi; DELAZERI, Eloi Evandro; BECKER, Tais Barbosa; MELLO-FARIAS, Paulo; ANTUNES, Luís Eduardo Correa. Nutrient solutions in the production of strawberry seedlings and their influence on agronomic performance. Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 20, n. 2, p. 159–169, 2021. DOI: 10.5965/223811712022021159. Disponível em: https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/19487. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)