Osmocote® promotes positive responses in the growth and nutrition of Lecythis lurida seedlings (Lecythidaceae)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712342024565Keywords:
nutritional analysis, forestry, plant nutrition, fertilizationAbstract
The success of reforestation projects for commercial and environmental purposes depends, among other factors, on the availability of nutrients during seedling production. Currently, controlled-release fertilizer is widely used because it provides quality seedlings. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of Osmocote® fertilizer in the initial growth and nutrition of Lecythis lurida seedlings. The seedlings were produced from seeds collected from mother trees in the municipalities of Vitória do Xingu and Altamira, state of Pará. Sowing was carried out in plastic bags with a capacity of 1 dm3, filled with coconut fiber substrate plus dded with doses of Osmocote® fertilizer. The experimental design adopted was completely randomized with a single factor (dose of Osmocote®) distributed into five doses: 0.0 (control); 2.0; 4.0; 6.0 and 8.0 g L-1 of Osmocote® fertilizer. For each treatment, 20 replications were used (one plant per replication). At 120 days after emergence, morphological parameters were evaluated to determine the growth of the seedling and nutritional analysis of the leaves. The dose of Osmocote® that provided the best response to morphological variables was 6.0 g L-1. The macro (micronutrients) extracted and exported by the Lecythis lurida seedling in g kg-1 (mg kg-1) were in the following order: K>N>Mg>S>Ca>P>(Fe>Mn>Zn>B>Cu). It is concluded that dose 6.0 g L-1 of Osmocote® improved the nutrition and quality of Lecythis lurida seedlings. The use of Osmocote® fertilizer allows greater growth and better nutritional status for Lecythis lurida seedlings.
Downloads
References
ABDULLAH HS et al. 2023. A Review on Industrial By-products as Materials to Coat Compound Fertilizer. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research 5.
ALVARES CA et al. 2013. Koppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22: 711-728.
ARAÚJO JM et al. 2023. Shading and controlled-release fertilizer in the production of Oenocarpus bataua Mart. Seedlings. Comunicata Scientiae 14: e3988.
BRACHTVOGEL EL & MALAVASI UC. 2010. Volume do recipiente, adubação e sua forma de mistura ao substrato no crescimento inicial de Peltophorum dubium (sprengel) taubert em viveiro. Revista Árvore 34: 223-232.
CORRÊA KKS et al. 2018. Ajuste e classificação do potencial volumétrico de Lecythis lurida (Miers) Mori, Flona do Tapajós. Nativa 6: 395-401.
COSTA JW et al. 2022. Effects of Raising Saturation by Bases on the Initial Growth of Yellow Ipe Seedlings. Ensaios e Ciências 26: 434-439.
CUNHA FL et al. 2021. Efficiency of slow release fertilizers in the production of Eucalyptus grandis seedlings. Floram 28.
DANTAS RP et al. 2018. Qualidade de mudas de Tabebuia aurea (manso) benth. & hook. em dois ambientes e diferentes níveis de fertirrigação. Ciência Florestal 28: 1253-1262.
DECHEN AR & NACHTIGALL GR. 2006. Micronutrientes. In: Fernandes MS, editor. Nutrição mineral de plantas. Viçosa: Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. p. 327-54.
DUARTE EF et al. 2020. Maturação de frutos e sementes de Inhaíba (Lecythis lurida [Miers] S. A. Mori – Lecythidaceae). Revista de Biologia Neotropical 17: 15-34.
EPSTEIN E & BLOOM AJ. 2004. Nutrição mineral de plantas: princípios e perspectivas. 2.ed. Londrina: Planta.
FAQUIN V. 2005. Nutrição Mineral de Plantas. Lavras: UFL.
FERREIRA DF. 2011. Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 35: 1039-1042.
FREITAS TAS et al. 2021. Produção de mudas de Senegalia bahiensis Benth. em diferentes volumes de tubetes. Ciência Florestal 31: 1105-1123.
FREITAS ECS et al. 2017. Crescimento e qualidade de mudas de Cassia grandis Linnaeus f. em resposta à adubação fosfatada e calagem. Ciência Florestal 27: 509-519.
GOMES EM et al. 2017. Qualidade de mudas de quiabeiro em função de diferentes dosagens de fertilizante de liberação lenta. Brazilian Journal of Applied Technology for Agricultural Science 10: 71-8.
HANSEL FD et al. 2021. Nutrição mineral como aliada das plantas na tolerância a estresses ambientais. INFORMAÇÕES AGRONÔMICAS NPCT Nº 9 – MARÇO/2021.
JARDIM IN et al. 2023. Osmocote® provides better seedlings of Calophyllum brasiliense Cambess. Scientia Plena 19: 090203.
JARDIM IN & SILVA HL. 2023. Efeitos benéficos do fertilizante de liberação controlada no crescimento e nutrição de mudas de cacau. Contribuciones a Las Ciencias Sociales 16: 30988-31007.
KOHLI SK et al. 2023. Boron in plants: uptake, deficiency and biological potential. Plant Growth Regulation 100: 267-282.
KOPINGA J & VAN DEN BURG J. 1995. Using soil and foliar analysis to diagnose the nutritional status of urban trees. Journal Arboriculture e Urban Forestry 21: 17-24.
LARCHER W. 2004. A utilização dos elementos minerais. In: Ecofisiologia Vegetal. São Carlos: Rima. p. 183-230.
LIU Z et al. 2022. Effects of Plant Hormones, Metal Ions, Salinity, Sugar, and Chemicals Pollution on Glucosinolate Biosynthesis in Cruciferous Plant. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 856442.
MADRID-AISPURO RE et al. 2020. Alternative substrates and fertilization doses in the production of Pinus cembroides Zucc. in nursery. Forests 11.
MALAVOLTA E et al. 1997. Avaliação do estado nutricional das plantas: Princípios e aplicações. 2.ed. Piracicaba: Potafos. 319p.
MARSCHNER P. 2012. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Adelaide: Academic Press.
MARTÍNEZ-NEVÁREZ LE et al. 2023. Growth and Efficiency in the Use of Nutrients of Pinus cooperi C. E. Blanco Seedlings Produced in Nurseries with a Controlled Release Fertilizer. Terra Latinoamericana 41: 1-12.
MENEGATTI RD et al. 2020. Different environments and doses of controlled-release fertilizer in peach rootstocks production. Advances in Horticultural Science 34: 157-166.
MEURER JM et al. 2018. Potássio. In: FERNANDES MS et al. Nutrição Mineral de Plantas. Viçosa: SBCS. p. 429-464
NEVES OSC & FIOR CS. 2020. Sintomas visuais de deficiência de macronutrientes, micronutrientes e toxidez por sódio em erva-mate. Revista Agrária Acadêmica 3: 66–77.
OLIVEIRA VP et al. 2021. Desenvolvimento e qualidade de mudas de Parkia gigantocarpa Ducke (Fabaceae) em função de fertilizante de liberação controlada. Scientia Plena 17.
PIMENTEL-GOMES F. 2009. Curso de estatística experimental. 15.ed. Piracicaba: FEALQ.
ROSSA UB et al. 2013. Fertilizante de liberação lenta no desenvolvimento de mudas de Schinus terebinthifolius e Sebastiania commersoniana. Floresta 43: 93-104.
RUSSO AA et al. 2022. Teores de nutrientes em solo e folhas de copaíba (Copaifera langsdorffii Desf.) em diferentes fitofisionomias. Revista Forestal Mesoamericana Kurú 19: 85-90.
SABOOR A et al. 2021. Zinc nutrition and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis effects on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and productivity. Saudi Journal of Biological Science 28: 6339-51.
SANTOS AR et al. 2020. Controlled-release fertilizer in the growth of Dalbergia nigra seedlings. Floresta 50: 1203-1212.
SILVA LDD et al. 2019. Controlled-release Fertilizer in the Production and Quality of Acacia mangium Seedlings. Floresta e Ambiente 26: e02092017.
SILVA OMC et al. 2022. Adubação fosfatada no crescimento inicial de sete espécies florestais nativas destinadas à recuperação de uma área degradada. Ciência Florestal 32: 371-394.
SMIDERLE OJ et al. 2018. Parameters of growth and nutrient absorption curve of african mahogany seedlings with and without nutrient solution. Revista Brasileira de Agropecuária Sustentável 8: 83-91.
SBCS-CQFS. 2004. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo–Comissão de Química e Fertilidade do Solo: Manual de adubação e de calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina. Porto Alegre: SBCS.
VEJAN P et al. 2021. Controlled release fertilizer: A review on developments, applications and potential in agriculture. Journal of Controlled Release 339: 321-334.
VIEIRA CR et al. 2020. Saturação por bases no crescimento e na qualidade de mudas de paricá. Scientia Forestalis 48: e2934.
WALTER LS et al. 2022. Growth and Quality of Yerba Mate Seedlings Affected by Fertilizer Doses in South Brazil. Agriculture, Agribusiness and Biotechnology 65: e22210394.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors & Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.
c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.
