Monitoring and baseline of glyphosate-resistant sourgrass in the main soybean growing regions of Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5965/223811712132022196Keywords:
discriminatory dose, mapping, dispersal, susceptibility, digitaria insularisAbstract
Frequent application of glyphosate for consecutive years has enhanced the selection pressure on sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) populations, which resulted in the development of glyphosate-resistant biotypes. Therefore, this work was developed with the objective of monitoring sourgrass resistance to glyphosate, develop a baseline of sourgrass susceptibility to this molecule and, consequently, identify the discriminatory dose between resistant and susceptible populations. This work was divided into three steps. The first step consisted of identifying and sorting sourgrass resistant and susceptible biotypes among 30 samples. In the second step, glyphosate baseline was elaborated considering exclusively the glyphosate-susceptible biotypes, which allowed the definition of a discriminatory dose. At the end, the third step, monitoring of glyphosate-resistant biotypes was achieved, considering five growing seasons (2016 – 2020) and 809 samples of sourgrass populations, collected throughout 12 states of Brazil. Glyphosate baseline was elaborated to sourgrass and ideal discriminatory rate was identified as 960 g ha-1. Glyphosate-resistant populations of sourgrass were found in all soybean growing regions sampled. Among 809 populations, 25.96% were considered resistant to glyphosate. The states with the highest frequency of glyphosate-resistant populations were Rio Grande do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Bahia, Mato Grosso and Paraná.
Downloads
References
ADEGAS FS et al. 2017. Impacto econômico da resistência de plantas daninhas a herbicidas no Brasil. Londrina: Embrapa Soja. 12p. (Embrapa Soja Circular Técnica).
ANDRADE JF et al. 2019. Interferência do estádio fenológico do capim-amargoso sobre a eficácia do herbicida glyphosate. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas 18:1-7.
BECKIE HJ et al. 2000. Screening for herbicide resistance in weeds. Weed Technology 14: 428-445.
BRADSHAW LD et al. 1997. Perspectives on glyphosate resistance. Weed Technology 11: 189-198.
BURGOS NR et al. 2013. Review: confirmation of resistance to herbicides and evaluation of resistance levels. Weed Science 61: 4-20.
BURGOS NR. 2015. Whole-plant and seed bioassays for resistance confirmation. Weed Science 63: 152-165.
CANEDO IF et al. 2019. Susceptibilidade diferencial ao herbicida glyphosate e capacidade de rebrota de populações de capim-amargoso. Revista Ceres 66: 18-25.
CARVALHO LB. 2011. Interferência de Digitaria insularis em Coffea arabica e respostas destas espécies ao glyphosate. Thesis (Doctoral in Crop Science). Tese (Doutorado em Produção Vegetal). Jaboticabal: UNESP. 118p.
CARVALHO SJP et al. 2005. Curvas de dose-resposta para avaliação do controle de fluxos de emergência de plantas daninhas pelo herbicida imazapic. Planta Daninha 23: 535-542.
CHRISTOFFOLETI PJ et al. 2009. Resistência de plantas daninhas aos herbicidas inibidores da EPSPs In: VELINI ED et al. (Coord). Glyphosate. Botucatu: FEPAF. p 309-356.
CHRISTOFFOLETI PJ. 2002. Curvas de dose-resposta de biótipos resistente e suscetível de Bidens pilosa L. aos herbicidas inibidores da ALS. Scientia Agricola 59: 513-519.
CORREIA NM et al. 2010. Resposta de diferentes populações de Digitaria insularis (L) Fedde ao herbicida glyphosate. Planta Daninha 28: 769-776.
DUKE SO & POWLES SB. 2008. Glyphosate: a once in a century herbicide. Pest Management Science 64: 319-325.
GALLI AJB & MONTEZUMA MC. 2005. Alguns aspectos do herbicida glyphosate na agricultura. Santo André: ACADCOM. 67p. (Technical Bulletin).
GONÇALVES NETTO A et al. 2015. Monitoramento da ocorrência de biótipos de capim-amargoso resistentes ao herbicida glyphosate na região do Sul de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas 14: 38-46.
GONÇALVES NETTO A et al. 2021. Population genomics of Digitaria insularis from soybean areas in Brazil. Pest Management Science 77: 5375-5381.
HEAP I & DUKE SO. 2018. Overview of glyphosate-resistant weeds worldwide. Pest Management Science 74: 1040-1049.
HEAP I. 2022. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Available at: http://wwwweedscienceorg/Homeaspx. Accessed on: January 27th. 2022.
LÓPEZ-OVEJERO et al. 2017. Frequency and Dispersal of Glyphosate-Resistant Sourgrass (Digitaria insularis) Populations across Brazilian Agricultural Production Areas. Weed Science 65: 1 - 10.
LORENZI H. 2014. Manual de identificação e controle de plantas daninhas: plantio direto e convencional. 7.ed. Nova Odessa: Instituto Plantarum.
PRESOTO et al. 2020. Sourgrass phenological stage and efficacy of ACCase-inhibiting Herbicides. Planta Daninha 38: 1-7.
RODRIGUES BN & ALMEIDA FS. 2018. Guia de herbicidas. 7.ed. Londrina: Produção Independente.
SEEFELDT SS et al. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose-response relationship. Weed Technology 9: 218-227.
STREIBIG JC. 1988. Herbicide bioassay. Weed Research 28: 479-484.
TAKANO HK. 2018. Spread of glyphosateresistant sourgrass (Digitaria insularis): independent selections or merely propagule dissemination? Weed Biology and Management 18: 1-13.
YANNICCARI M et al. 2016. Glyphosate resistance in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L) is associated with a fitness penalty. Weed Science 64: 71-79.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Authors & Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal are in agreement with the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyrights and concede to the journal the copyright for the first publication, according to Creative Commons Attribution Licence.
b) Authors have the authority to assume additional contracts with the content of the manuscript.
c) Authors may supply and distribute the manuscript published by this journal.
