Solarization and soil mulching on weed infestation in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)

Authors

  • Sebastião de Oliveira Maia Júnior Universidade Federal de Campina Grande-UFCG
  • Jailma Ribeiro de Andrade Universidade Federal de Alagoas- UFAL
  • Luciene Ribeiro de Andrade Universidade Federal de Alagoas- UFAL
  • Claudiana Moura dos Santos Universidade Federal de Alagoas- UFAL
  • Lennon Kledson dos Santos Silva Universidade Federal de Alagoas- UFAL
  • Aldair de Souza Medeiros Universidade Federal de Alagoas- UFAL
  • Lígia Sampaio Reis Universidade Federal de Alagoas- UFAL

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5965/223811711832019466

Keywords:

Vigna unguiculata, invasive plants, yield

Abstract

Weed infestation is among the problems of greater interference in agriculture, and therefore has awakened the use of management techniques, as the use of solarization and mulching on the ground, that can mitigate this problem. Thus, was objectified with this work to evaluate the management of solarization and soil mulching on weed infestation in cowpea. The experiment was carried in greenhouse under a completely randomized design with eight treatments, such as: soil solarization (with and without) and three dead cover crops (castor bean, crotalaria and spontaneous vegetation + with four replications. The research was conducted in pots with a capacity of 11 dm3, filled with eight kg of soil, and the sowing was carried out directly in the pots. At 80 days after sowing, the number and total dry mass of weeds in each experimental unit were determined. During this period, the growth and yield characteristics of cowpea were also evaluated. The number and total dry mass of weeds were higher in the uncovered soil, independent of solarization, and the dry mass was higher in the absence of solarization. This weed infestation reduced the length of the main branch, number of leaves, number and length of pods, production of dry mass and amount of water in the aerial part of the cowpea, while increasing the root dry mass. Solarization, when isolated, does not totally suppress the incidence of weeds, but reduces their development. On the other hand, soil cover, independent of type and solarization, reduces the incidence of weeds favoring growth, yield and dry matter production in the aerial part of the cowpea.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALMEIDA RA et al. 1996. Efeitos de diversas espécies de cobertura morta sobre o controle de plantas daninhas da cultura do milho (Zea mays). Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 26: 71-78.

BAPTISTA MJ et al. 2006. Solarização do solo e biofumigação no cultivo protegido de tomate. Horticultura Brasileira 24: 47-52.

BEZERRA AAC et al. 2014. Morfofisiologia e produção de feijão-caupi, cultivar BRS Novaera, em função da densidade de plantas. Revista Caatinga 27: 135-141.

BORGES LS et al. 2014. Índices morfo-fisiológicos e produtividade de cultivares de jambu influenciadas pela adubação orgânica e mineral. Bioscience Journal 30: 1768-1778.

BRAUN-BLANQUET J. 1979. Fitossociologia: bases para el estudio de las comunidades vegetales. Madrid: H. Blume. 820 p.

CABRAL PHR et al. 2013. Interferência de plantas daninhas na cultura do sorgo cultivado em safrinha. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 43: 308-314.

CANDIDO V et al. 2011. Weed control and yield response of soil solarization with different plastic films in lettuce. Scientia Horticulturae 130: 491-497.

FERREIRA NM et al. 2015. Crescimento e produção da mamoneira BRS Paraguaçu sob irrigação, cobertura do solo e adubação orgânica. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 19: 857–864.

FLÔRES JA et al. 2017. Agronomic and qualitative traits of common bean as a function of the straw and nitrogen fertilization. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 47: 195-201.

FORTE CT et al. 2018. Coberturas vegetais do solo e manejo de cultivo e suas contribuições para as culturas agrícolas. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 13: e5501.

HIRATA ACS et al. 2009. Plantas de cobertura no controle de plantas daninhas na cultura do tomate em plantio direto. Planta Daninha 27: 465-472.

IBGE 2017. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Produção Agrícola Municipal (PAM). Disponível em https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/tabela/1612#resultado. Acesso: 03 Abr. 2019.

KATAN J. 1981. Solar-heating (solarization) of soil for control of soil-borne pests. Annual Review of’ Phytopathology 19: 211-236.

KHAN MA et al. 2012. Soil Solarization: an organic weed-management approach in cauliflower. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 43: 1847–1860.

MAGALHÃES ID et al. 2017. Physiology and grain yield of common beans under evapotranspirated water reposition levels. Irrigation & Drainage Systems Engineering 6: 1-8.

MAIA JÚNIOR SO et al. 2018. Soil management and mulching for weed control in cowpea. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 48: 453-460.

MARTINS D et al. 2016. Coberturas mortas de inverno e controle químico sobre plantas daninhas na cultura do milho. Revista Ciência Agronômica 47: 649-657.

MESCHEDE DK et al. 2007. Avaliação de diferentes coberturas na supressão de plantas daninhas no cerrado. Planta Daninha 25: 465-471.

MONQUERO PA et al. 2009. Efeito de adubos verdes na supressão de espécies de plantas daninhas. Planta Daninha 27: 85-95.

OLIVEIRA FS et al. 2018. Competition between cowpea and weeds for water: effect on plants growth. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 13: e5507.

OSIPITAN OA. 2017. Weed interference and control in cowpea production: A review. Journal of Agricultural Science 9: 11-20.

PESSÔA UCM et al. 2017. Desempenho fisiológico e crescimento do feijão-caupi, sob manejos de plantas daninhas. Revista Verde 12: 246-250.

SALGADO TP et al. 2007. Interferência das plantas daninhas no feijoeiro carioca. Planta Daninha 25: 443-448.

SANTOS HG et al. 2013. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. 3.ed. Brasília: Embrapa. 353p.

SANTOS RF et al. 2014. Solarização do solo associada à aplicação de Trichoderma spp. no controle de Sclerotinia sclerotiorun. Revista de Ciências Agrárias 57: 322-325.

SIDDIQUI MH et al. 2018. Parthenium hysterophorus herbage mulching: a potential source of weeds control in soybean (Glycine max). Planta Daninha 36: 1-9.

SOUMYA TM et al. 2004. Effect of soil solarization on weedcount, weed dry weight and pod yield of groundnut. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 17: 548-550.

TEÓFILO TMS et al. 2012. Eficiência no uso da água e interferência de plantas daninhas no meloeiro cultivado nos sistemas de plantio direto e convencional. Planta Daninha 30: 547-556.

YEGANEHPOOR F et al. 2015. Effects of cover crops and weed management on corn yield. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 14: 178-181.

ZIECH ARD et al. 2014. Cultivo de alface em diferentes manejos de cobertura do solo e fontes de adubação. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 18: 948–954.

Published

2019-12-12

How to Cite

MAIA JÚNIOR, Sebastião de Oliveira; ANDRADE, Jailma Ribeiro de; ANDRADE, Luciene Ribeiro de; SANTOS, Claudiana Moura dos; SILVA, Lennon Kledson dos Santos; MEDEIROS, Aldair de Souza; REIS, Lígia Sampaio. Solarization and soil mulching on weed infestation in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias, Lages, v. 18, n. 4, p. 466–473, 2019. DOI: 10.5965/223811711832019466. Disponível em: https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/14575. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Issue

Section

Research Article - Science of Plants and Derived Products

Most read articles by the same author(s)