Growth and distribution of soybean roots at different plant densities

Alvadi Antonio Balbinot Junior, Henrique Debiasi, Julio Cezar Franchini, João Pedro Carlos Prieto, Moacir Tuzzin de Moraes, Flávia Werner, André Sampaio Ferreira

Abstract


The soybean plant has long been known to have a high phenotypic plasticity, altering shoot morphological traits in response to variations on plant density. However, plant density effects on soybean root growth and distribution in the soil profile are not elucidated. This paper aimed at evaluating the effects of three plant densities on soybean root growth at different soil layers and horizontal positions relative to the crop planting row. The study comprised two field experiments carried out during 2014/2015 growing season in Londrina, PR, Southern Brazil, one with the soybean cultivar BRS 359 RR, and other with the cultivar BMX Potência RR.  Both experiments were laid out in a randomized complete block design and split-split-plot arrangement, with three replications. In the main plots, three soybean seeding rates (150; 300; and 450 thousand seeds ha-1) were distributed; in the subplots, five soil layers (0-10; 10-20; 20-30; 30-40 and 40-50 cm depth); and, in the sub-subplots, three horizontal sampling positions (row; interrow on the left; and interrow on the right). Higher soybean plant densities led to thinner roots, with greater growth towards the crop interrows and deeper soil layers, but the cultivars can affect this behavior.

Keywords


Glycine max L., root dry matter density, root surface area, root length density, root diameter.

References


BALBINOT JUNIOR AA et al. 2015a. Semeadura cruzada em cultivares de soja com tipo de crescimento determinado. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 36:1215-1226.

BALBINOT JUNIOR AA et al. 2015b. Espaçamento reduzido e plantio cruzado associados a diferentes densidades de plantas em soja. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 36: 2977-2986.

BENJAMIN JG & NIELSEN DC. 2006. Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea. Field Crops Research 97: 248-253.

BORDIN I et al. 2008. Matéria seca, carbono e nitrogênio de raízes de soja e milho em plantio direto e convencional. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 43: 1785-1792.

CHENG L et al. 2014. Interactions between light intensity and phosphorus nutrition affect the phosphate-mining capacity of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 65: 2995-3003.

COX WJ & CHERNEY JH. 2011. Growth and yield responses of soybean to row spacing and seeding rate. Agronomy Journal 103:123-128.

ERICSSON T. 1995. Growth and shoot: root ratio of seedlings in relation to nutrient availability. Plant and Soil 168-169:205-214.

FAN J et al. 2016. Root distribution by depth for temperate agricultural crops. Field Crops Research 189:68-74.

GASPAR AP & CONLEY SP. 2015. Responses of canopy reflectance, light interception, and soybean seed yield to replanting suboptimal stands. Crop Science 55: 377-385.

HANNA SO et al. 2008. Fungicide application timing and row spacing effect on soybean canopy penetration and grain yield. Agronomy Journal 100: 1488-1492.

HÉRBERT Y et al. 2001. The response of root/shoot partitioning and root morphology to light reduction in maize genotypes. Crop Science 41: 363-371.

HUTCHINGS MJ & JOHN EA. 2004. The effects of environmental heterogeneity on root growth and root/shoot partitioning. Annals of Botany 94: 1-8.

KASPERBAUER MJ. 1987. Far-Red Light reflection from green leaves and effects on phytochrome-mediated assimilate partitioning under field conditions. Plant Physiology 85: 350-354.

PANTALONE VR et al. 1996. Phenotypic evaluation of root traits in soybean and applicability to plant breeding. Crop Science 36: 456-459.

PECHÁČKOVÁ S. 1999. Root response to above-ground light quality – Differences between rhizomatous and non-rhizomatous clones of Festuca rubra. Plant Ecology 141: 67-77.

POSTMA JA et al. 2014. Dynamic root growth and architecture responses to limiting nutrient availability: linking physiological models and experimentation. Biotechnology Advances 32: 53-65.

PROCÓPIO SO et al. 2013. Plantio cruzado na cultura da soja utilizando uma cultivar de hábito de crescimento indeterminado. Revista de Ciências Agrárias/Amazonian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 56: 319-325.

TARDIEU F. 2012. Any trait or trait-related allele can confer drought tolerance: just design the right drought scenario. Journal of Experimental Botany 63: 25-31.

WHITE RG & KIRKEGAARD JA. 2010. The distribution and abundance of wheat roots in a dense, structured subsoil – implications for water uptake. Plant, Cell and Environment 33: 133-148.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5965/223811711712018012

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Rev. Ciênc. Agrovet.), Lages, SC, Brasil        ISSN 2238-1171